Impact of Dangling Bonds on the Electronic Structure of III-V Quantum Dots
- 7 minutes ago
- 3 min read
By Norick De Vlamynck, Jordi Llusar, Ivan Infante, and Zeger Hens

Quantum dots are at the heart of next-generation technologies, from high-resolution displays to infrared sensors. However, many of the most efficient systems rely on toxic heavy metals, limiting their widespread use. III–V quantum dots offer a safer alternative, with tunable optical properties and compatibility with solution-based processing. Yet, their performance has long been hindered by poorly understood surface defects. In this work, we uncover how anion dangling bonds – unsatisfied atomic bonds at the surface – fundamentally shape the electronic structure of III–V quantum dots.
While global research has primarily focused on InP and InAs QDs, colloidal synthesis protocols now extend to InSb and Ga-based III-V compounds. Interestingly, different materials can produce the same emission color: for example, both InP and GaAs quantum dots can emit red light. This flexibility opens the door to optimizing device performance without changing operational wavelengths.

As-synthesized InP QDs typically exhibit negligible photoluminescent properties. Using large-scale density functional theory (DFT) simulations on the Vlaams Supercomputer Centrum, we analyzed the electronic structure of InP quantum dots and found that unpassivated P(-1-1-1) facets are responsible for the formation of mid-gap orbitals (Figure 1). These orbitals are highly localized at the surface and disrupt the ideal electronic structure of the material. By visualizing the electronic structure through the Bloch orbital expansion, we could clearly distinguish between surface-localized orbitals and those resembling the bulk semiconductor. This allowed us to define a surface-band orbital width ΔSBO, a quantitative measure of how strongly surface defects affect the electronic structure.

Extending our analysis to nine different III-V semiconductors, ranging from AlP to InSb, revealed that the susceptibility to these surface orbitals strongly depends on composition. Where the (-1-1-1) facets are detrimental to the Al-based compounds, an increasing facet tolerance is observed for P < As < Sb and Al < In < Ga-based materials (Figure 2). When we also account for quantum dot size, where larger dots expose more surface area and thus more dangling bonds, GaSb, InSb, and GaAs emerge as the most promising candidates, combining favorable electronic properties with increased tolerance to surface defects.
Role of VSC
Access to extensive VSC Tier-1 resources allowed us to screen the electronic structure of an entire family of III-V quantum dots, pointing Ga-based III-V quantum dots as the next-generation materials for short-wave infrared sensors, imagers and light sources.

🔍 Your Research Matters — Let’s Share It!
Have you used VSC’s computing power in your research? Did our infrastructure support your simulations, data analysis, or workflow?
We’d love to hear about it!
Take part in our #ShareYourSuccess campaign and show how VSC helped move your research forward. Whether it’s a publication, a project highlight, or a visual from your work, your story can inspire others.
🖥️ Be featured on our website and social media. Show the impact of your work. Help grow our research community
📬 Submit your story: https://www.vscentrum.be/sys



